Jean-Paul Calderone
authored
removing the operation-id may not actually be an improvement ... it is a simplification, though. However it requires us to load all the rows into python and then send them back to the database instead of only loading them. I thought removing the operation-id from the in-use table would be a win and maybe it is but not for the reason I thought - sqlite3 emits the same code whether you do `in [foo]` or `in (select x from [foo])` as far as I can tell. Still, I like the simplification so we'll go with it for now.
Name | Last commit | Last update |
---|