Skip to content
Snippets Groups Projects

Don't include vagrant in shell.nix if running in a container.

Merged Tom Prince requested to merge tomprince/PrivateStorageio:no-vagrant-in-container into develop

It is unlikely that a container will be able to run VirtualBox, so don't bother including vagrant in the nix-shell environment.

For me, this reduces the amount I need to download to run nix-shell from >1G to <15M. (I've carrying a patch that removed the dependency to avoid downloading that much; the measurements only include the effect of adding vagrant or the minimal vagrant to the definition.)

This is an alternative to !164 (closed) that doesn't use a non-default vagrant package.

Merge request reports

Loading
Loading

Activity

Filter activity
  • Approvals
  • Assignees & reviewers
  • Comments (from bots)
  • Comments (from users)
  • Commits & branches
  • Edits
  • Labels
  • Lock status
  • Mentions
  • Merge request status
  • Tracking
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
  • Loading
Please register or sign in to reply
Loading