- Jun 23, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
- Jun 10, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
This makes for ugly logs though probably no functional impairment.
-
- Jun 08, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
So we'll just have a practical zero second delay
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
Combined with the new issuer behavior, this should not impose an undue load on any part of the system while providing the most responsive payment experience possible.
-
- Jun 02, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
- Jun 01, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
It gets in the way of Eliot logging.
-
- May 28, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
If SpendingController develops some internal state it should really remain internal, anyway. Don't make _plugin.py worry about this.
-
- May 26, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
just bumping CI really
-
- May 25, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
removing the operation-id may not actually be an improvement ... it is a simplification, though. However it requires us to load all the rows into python and then send them back to the database instead of only loading them. I thought removing the operation-id from the in-use table would be a win and maybe it is but not for the reason I thought - sqlite3 emits the same code whether you do `in [foo]` or `in (select x from [foo])` as far as I can tell. Still, I like the simplification so we'll go with it for now.
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
Instead of immediately extracting passes, get them and later mark up the store with the outcome of the attempt to use them.
-
- May 22, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
Parens can create a tuple or something and we don't want that.
-
- May 21, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
Along with an in-memory implementation of a pass factory that works with it.
-
- May 20, 2020
-
-
Jean-Paul Calderone authored
-